<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Off camera lighting for weddings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting</link>
	<description>A place for photographers to share and inspire others</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting/comment-page-1#comment-13656</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=83#comment-13656</guid>
		<description>Yes, softboxes I use pretty often to soften the light at a wedding.  Such a great way to soften the light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, softboxes I use pretty often to soften the light at a wedding.  Such a great way to soften the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting/comment-page-1#comment-13512</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=83#comment-13512</guid>
		<description>Did you use softboxes to minimize the shadow? beauty dish? or 3 different lights for your wedding images at night? I haven&#039;t quite perfected the shadowless image--tips?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you use softboxes to minimize the shadow? beauty dish? or 3 different lights for your wedding images at night? I haven&#8217;t quite perfected the shadowless image&#8211;tips?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using Exposure Compensation for flash photography &#124; Digital Photo Buzz - Digital Photography reviews and tips</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting/comment-page-1#comment-3968</link>
		<dc:creator>Using Exposure Compensation for flash photography &#124; Digital Photo Buzz - Digital Photography reviews and tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=83#comment-3968</guid>
		<description>[...] Speed Sync and Flash photography Off camera lighting for weddings Creative lighting for first dance photos Vivitar 285 HV [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speed Sync and Flash photography Off camera lighting for weddings Creative lighting for first dance photos Vivitar 285 HV [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting/comment-page-1#comment-2521</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 04:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=83#comment-2521</guid>
		<description>That is one of the hardest parts about shooting in the dark (or near dark).  Generally at a wedding reception there is enough ambient light so I can focus with autofocus but I have to look for sharp lines to focus on like the edge of someones shirt or a necklace, anything with a sharp edge and the camera seems to do a little better with focusing.  I prefer to shoot at 2.8 so there isn&#039;t too much room for error but normally I can do pretty good at a reception.  If it is pitch black then i&#039;ll raise the aperture a bit to around f/4 or f/5.6 and manually set the focus to around 3-4 feet.  Then I just move around the floor and visually try and keep my subjects in that range and don&#039;t touch the focus at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is one of the hardest parts about shooting in the dark (or near dark).  Generally at a wedding reception there is enough ambient light so I can focus with autofocus but I have to look for sharp lines to focus on like the edge of someones shirt or a necklace, anything with a sharp edge and the camera seems to do a little better with focusing.  I prefer to shoot at 2.8 so there isn&#8217;t too much room for error but normally I can do pretty good at a reception.  If it is pitch black then i&#8217;ll raise the aperture a bit to around f/4 or f/5.6 and manually set the focus to around 3-4 feet.  Then I just move around the floor and visually try and keep my subjects in that range and don&#8217;t touch the focus at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivor Tetteh-Lartey Photography</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting/comment-page-1#comment-2513</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivor Tetteh-Lartey Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=83#comment-2513</guid>
		<description>When you were shooting in the dark, how did you compose and focus? I use Nikon speed lights which have a modelling light effect, but drain battery power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you were shooting in the dark, how did you compose and focus? I use Nikon speed lights which have a modelling light effect, but drain battery power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Off Camera Lighting at Occasions- Wedding&#160;&#124;&#160;CAM&#39;s Photo Lighting</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting/comment-page-1#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>Off Camera Lighting at Occasions- Wedding&#160;&#124;&#160;CAM&#39;s Photo Lighting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 03:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=83#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>[...] chance to shoot? What would you do after sunset? Read on, here&#8217;s something about it&#8230;Digital Photo Buzz is rolling out a setup for their wedding photography after sunset. There were two Q-Flash applied [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chance to shoot? What would you do after sunset? Read on, here&#8217;s something about it&#8230;Digital Photo Buzz is rolling out a setup for their wedding photography after sunset. There were two Q-Flash applied [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Off camera lighting for weddings &#124; Digital Photo Buzz - Digital Photography reviews and tips -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting/comment-page-1#comment-1685</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Off camera lighting for weddings &#124; Digital Photo Buzz - Digital Photography reviews and tips -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 22:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=83#comment-1685</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Eric Harding. Eric Harding said: Off camera lighting for weddings http://bit.ly/cwcHau #photo #photog #flash #wedding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Eric Harding. Eric Harding said: Off camera lighting for weddings <a href="http://bit.ly/cwcHau" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cwcHau</a> #photo #photog #flash #wedding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting/comment-page-1#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=83#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Hi Douglas,

The Qflashes do need to be powered by a battery unit that Quantum makes which are pricey (but do last long and have a good amount of power)

You can see these on our amazon gear box here:
http://astore.amazon.com/stagiimageryb-20/detail/B00009XVRV
Right now they are $569 which is pretty much the norm for these guys.

With the battery pack they will cost much more than the 580&#039;s but they are more powerful and have a better light spread for portraits (since the light is in a domed reflector, they spread light better than the rectangular speedlights)  

These or monolights (we use the alien bees) I think are perfect for on location lighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Douglas,</p>
<p>The Qflashes do need to be powered by a battery unit that Quantum makes which are pricey (but do last long and have a good amount of power)</p>
<p>You can see these on our amazon gear box here:<br />
<a href="http://astore.amazon.com/stagiimageryb-20/detail/B00009XVRV" rel="nofollow">http://astore.amazon.com/stagiimageryb-20/detail/B00009XVRV</a><br />
Right now they are $569 which is pretty much the norm for these guys.</p>
<p>With the battery pack they will cost much more than the 580&#8242;s but they are more powerful and have a better light spread for portraits (since the light is in a domed reflector, they spread light better than the rectangular speedlights)  </p>
<p>These or monolights (we use the alien bees) I think are perfect for on location lighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting/comment-page-1#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=83#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Curious how you powered the QFlash?  I don&#039;t own them, but I am considering getting them.  Are they battery powered?  Any good articles on the units themselves?  Not sure whether or not to invest in these or additional 580 EXII&#039;s for doing this type of exercises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious how you powered the QFlash?  I don&#8217;t own them, but I am considering getting them.  Are they battery powered?  Any good articles on the units themselves?  Not sure whether or not to invest in these or additional 580 EXII&#8217;s for doing this type of exercises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intro to lighting, off camera lighting for weddings &#124; Digital Photo Buzz - Digital Photography reviews and tips</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/off-camera-wedding-lighting/comment-page-1#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Intro to lighting, off camera lighting for weddings &#124; Digital Photo Buzz - Digital Photography reviews and tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=83#comment-101</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is a shot that we did in a pitch black field. It was an awesome shot to end the wedding and made a perfect full page spread in their album. I&#8217;ll give a breakdown on how this image was made next week in our shot of the week post. Update: read how we got this shot here (Using on location off camera lighting) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is a shot that we did in a pitch black field. It was an awesome shot to end the wedding and made a perfect full page spread in their album. I&#8217;ll give a breakdown on how this image was made next week in our shot of the week post. Update: read how we got this shot here (Using on location off camera lighting) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

