<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom 3 noise reduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalphotobuzz.com/lightroom-3-noise-reduction/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/lightroom-3-noise-reduction</link>
	<description>A place for photographers to share and inspire others</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:41:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Editing your photos in Lightroom 3 &#124; Digital Photo Buzz - Digital Photography reviews and tips</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/lightroom-3-noise-reduction/comment-page-1#comment-2529</link>
		<dc:creator>Editing your photos in Lightroom 3 &#124; Digital Photo Buzz - Digital Photography reviews and tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=995#comment-2529</guid>
		<description>[...] tool compared to Lightroom 2. Check out our comparison of noise reduction from Lightroom 3 here: Lightroom 2 vs 3 noise reduction . Even for those Lightroom 3 pros out there there are some great little shortcuts and nuggets you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tool compared to Lightroom 2. Check out our comparison of noise reduction from Lightroom 3 here: Lightroom 2 vs 3 noise reduction . Even for those Lightroom 3 pros out there there are some great little shortcuts and nuggets you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/lightroom-3-noise-reduction/comment-page-1#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 03:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=995#comment-757</guid>
		<description>Yes, I still think if you really need to fix a noisy shot Noise Ninja is the best.  That is the main noise reduction I have used and will probably keep using it.  However if Lightroom (or Aperture) could keep improving a little in this area it would be so much better to do it quickly in the same software I am using to edit my images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I still think if you really need to fix a noisy shot Noise Ninja is the best.  That is the main noise reduction I have used and will probably keep using it.  However if Lightroom (or Aperture) could keep improving a little in this area it would be so much better to do it quickly in the same software I am using to edit my images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Rea Photography</title>
		<link>http://digitalphotobuzz.com/lightroom-3-noise-reduction/comment-page-1#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Rea Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphotobuzz.com/?p=995#comment-753</guid>
		<description>Great article!  I definitely think that I will be moving to LR3 when it hits the market since I&#039;m such an LR addict.  With that said...I still think we need to leave solid pixel editing to pixel editing software.  LR3 does appear to be doing an ok job with the noise reduction but I still think that running a proprietary noise software (i.e., Noise Ninja or others) is always the best option. I normally try not to spend time on noise in my workflow until its absolutely necessary for production. Thanks for the review and insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!  I definitely think that I will be moving to LR3 when it hits the market since I&#8217;m such an LR addict.  With that said&#8230;I still think we need to leave solid pixel editing to pixel editing software.  LR3 does appear to be doing an ok job with the noise reduction but I still think that running a proprietary noise software (i.e., Noise Ninja or others) is always the best option. I normally try not to spend time on noise in my workflow until its absolutely necessary for production. Thanks for the review and insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
